cardiff university pass mark
your third and final attempt at the module, unless you are granted an examining board remedy through the receiving and considering recommendations from Boards of Studies; reviewing and analysing student feedback and considering any recommendations from the Student Staff Panel(s); ensuring that the arrangements for teaching, assessment and supporting students adhere to and are aligned with the Universitys regulations, policies and procedures and the Universitys strategies; identifying enhancement initiatives which contribute to the achievement of the aims of the Education and Student sub-strategy and oversight on the impact and effectiveness of actions taken; ensuring the completion of Schools Annual Review and Enhancement (ARE) submission; providing oversight of the implementation and effectiveness of actions in the Student Experience Enhancement plan; promoting opportunities for staff development; integrating consideration of equality, and diversity and inclusion and sustainability in all matters falling within its remit. We have dividedthe information and resources you need into the pages below. total number of credits and level, number of stages; progression and award classification rules. 1.3 It is usually a requirement of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) that you exhaust the Universitys procedures and seek a review, under the University Review Procedure, before you submit a complaint to the OIA. 1.4 Credit is an award made to a student in recognition of the achievement of designated learning outcomes at a specified credit level. Cardiff School of Management. The purpose of the regulations and associated policies is to ensure that Cardiff University can discharge effectively its responsibilities to all students fairly and effectively and to ensure that the standards of awards are consistent with the relevant national qualification frameworks. second and final attempt at the module, unless you are granted an examining board remedy through the The Academic Regulations state that the appeals procedure can take around 90 days. Procedure in addition to, or instead of, the Academic Appeals Procedure. how the module will be assessed, including the weighting for each element of assessment. departments) to obtain this evidence for you. 4.4 Student Academic Engagement Procedure (Taught Programmes partial student engagement). 1.2A research degree may be awarded by the University in recognition of the successful completion of a programme of independent study and research, which may include periods of approved professional practice. limit. The Head of Student Cases will consider if it is If you believe that you have an appropriate reason to appeal, but it does not coincide 4.3 Your offer will be either conditional or unconditional: Conditional means that there are academic, non-academic, or English/Welsh language requirements that will need to be met before a place can be confirmed. The Regulations for PhD by Published Works have been approved by Senate. 6.4Where a viva examination has taken place and the students illness prevents them from making revisions to the thesis that are required by the examiners for an award to be recommended in the usual way, the examiners may be asked to consider the recommendation of an aegrotat award. The University will not contact third parties (e.g. 5.3 After an application has been submitted, or after an offer of study has been made, applicants may request to defer their application/place for up to 12 months from the start date of the programme originally applied for. If and when you appeal. Master and Postgraduate Diploma programmes, From admission through to completion, all students are provided with the support that they need to succeed in and benefit from higher education, The provider reviews its core practices for quality regularly and uses the outcomes to drive improvement and enhancement. 8.2 The Universitys Admissions process is founded on the following principles: 8.3 The following policies and procedures are associated with these Regulations: Applicant Verification policy: details the policy and procedure for investigating concerns regarding false, incorrect, or misleading information. 3.2 Entry requirements will be set in line with the requirements of the QAA UK Quality Code for Higher Education. 4.5.1 Examining Boards will be established in accordance with Senate Assessment and Examining Board Regulations. I've managed teams of 40+, successfully . This tool is designed to support Be representatives of the University and act accordingly; Act in accordance with the Universitys regulations and policies; Treat other people with dignity and respect; Maintain the expected standards of academic practice, integrity and engagement. Specific programmes may also stipulate a minimum word-length for the Dissertation. . identifying enhancement initiatives which contribute to the achievement of the aims of the Education and Student sub-strategy; reviewing and evaluating student feedback; oversight of progress on the implementation, impact and effectiveness of enhancement activities and initiatives; evaluating the impact of policies relating to the student experience; promoting innovation and enhancement in teaching and assessment; considering issues raised by School Education and Student Experience Committees; ensuring that the arrangements for the supervision and monitoring of postgraduate research students comply with the University requirements, and are readily accessible to all staff and students; ensuring that all students have adequate supervision in the pursuit of their research goals and professional development needs; considering and confirming student entitlements, including provision in terms of space / infrastructure, access to funding for conferences, research costs, travel and training, and teaching opportunities; ensuring appropriate arrangements for the consideration of applications and conduct of interviews; reviewing and considering student feedback received from surveys and the Student Staff Panel; reviewing management information, including, progression, submission, completion, feedback from students and examiners, and use such information to inform School actions; opportunities for the enhancement of the student experience; issues or concerns relating to the arrangements for research degrees and/or student experience which require further consideration at University-level. 3.5 Accountability for the quality of the educational experiences made available to students, including those pursuing modules offered by the School within jointly-taught and co-taught programmes, and programmes where the first year is inter-School based, will rest with the Heads of the participating Schools. 2.3 Applicants must satisfy all entry requirement(s) and terms of enrolment as published under the programme entry requirements and/or as stated in a formal offer of study or enrolment. Part-time PhD - Change to maximum period of study from 7 to 8 years. Additional text added to clarify decision-making. 10 years ago. 3.2 All proposals which require the approval of University Committees or have resource implications, will be subject to the written approval of the relevant Head/(s) of School and College PVC. It said the decision was "fundamentally unfair . 4.3 The combined registration and submission fee for PhD by Published Works is equivalent to the standard annual tuition fee charged by the University to part-time PhD students, as current at the time of enrolment. It has the ultimate power of decision in all matters affecting the University (Ordinance 4). judgement. Where a provider works in partnership with other organisations, it has in place effective arrangements to ensure that the standards of its awards are credible and secure irrespective of where or how courses are delivered or who delivers them. 3.3 All resit assessments will be held in the Resit Examination period, prior to the start of the following academic session. 11.3 Examining Boards will be established by Heads of School, in accordance with one of the following structures: Programme Examining Board: A Programme Examining Board is wholly responsible for one or more programmes without reference to a Subject Examining Board. 4.4 The viva must be held at the University, on a face-to-face basis, with all parties present in the same room at the same time, unless approval has been given to hold the viva by electronic media or in a location outside the University, in accordance with the Policy and Procedure for the Arrangement and Conduct of Research Degree Examinations (Viva) in Alternative Formats. 2.1.It is expected that as members of the University community students will: Further details of expectations for student conduct are provided in the Student Conduct Procedure. From admission through to completion, all students are provided with the support that they need to succeed in and benefit from higher education. This assessment will be retrospectively uncapped pending the outcome of a This page covers the system used to assess and classify Masters degrees in the UK. A re-examination fee will be payable. In accordance with relevant legislation, the University will consider reasonable adjustments for students with disabilities, provided it does not impact on academic competency standards. Where a provider works in partnership with other organisations, it has in place effective arrangements to ensure that the academic experience is high-quality irrespective of where or how courses are delivered and who delivers them. If they also fail in the retake attempt, the university may consider them illegible for the course. 1.2 The candidate will be approved for the award upon completion of corrections and amendments. Ive been given a re-sit, will this be capped at the pass-mark? How can I challenge it? a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice, a comprehensive understanding of techniques applicable to the research or advanced scholarship, originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline. 7. 5.1.2 The Group shall develop and keep under review a PGR strategy, and make recommendations thereon to the Pro Vice-Chancellors, Research, Innovation and Enterprise and Education and Students. 8.7 The University considers requests from individual students to undertake assessments, including examinations, outside Cardiff in the summer resit examination period, and in exceptional circumstances, requests from individual students to undertake assessments, including examinations, outside Cardiff at other times. 2.1 The University has general entrance requirements in place to ensure that applicants have the necessary prerequisites to succeed on a programme at the University. 1.6 These regulations are for research degree programmes leading to the award of the following degrees: PhD (Doctor of Philosophy); MD (Doctor of Medicine); EngD (Doctor of Engineering); Doctoral Degrees by Examination and Thesis (Professional Doctorates); and MPhil (Master of Philosophy). Assessment for the award of a Doctoral Degree by Examination and Thesis (a Professional Doctorate) includes, additionally, the examination of taught components and/or professional practice. Appeals procedure. It's not the worst mark, but perhaps some tutoring might help next time. 16th March 2020, the resit number will remain at attempt two and the mark will remain capped at the pass 2.2 Any student who wishes to be examined in whole or in part through the medium of Welsh must notify the Academic Registrar of the request, in writing, as soon as possible and by the end of week 9 of each semester, at the latest, to ensure that appropriate arrangements can be made. If you are stating that your circumstances and your appeal related to a Protected Characteristic, it is 3.3 Applicants for a PhD by Published Work must meet the conditions of the University General Entrance Requirement. 4.5 Research Monitoring Regulations Policy and Procedure (Research Students). Minutes will also be submitted to the Students Union which will produce semester-based reports on activity across the University. The expectations and practices noted in the supporting advice and guidance on Concerns, Complaints and Appeals, being particularly relevant: 1.1 The University aims to provide you with high-quality opportunities to help you pursue your programme and study towards your degree. The candidate must be able to demonstrate clearly their own contribution in any co-authored works. The regulations will be kept under regular review to ensure they continue both to support internal processes to function efficiently and effectively, and to fully meet the requirements of the OIA Good Practice Framework for handling complaints and academic appeals, and the revised UK Quality Code for Higher Education. The candidate is allowed to resubmit their thesis for a subsidiary award on one further occasion only. 2.1 For the purpose of these Regulations, a work is regarded as published only if it is traceable through ordinary catalogues, abstracts or citation indices, and copies are available in the public domain. year, this may incur additional fees. Third: If you get between 45%-49%, you need to start thinking about where you went wrong. 8.3 The scheduling of examinations, and the format of the examination paper rubrics will be in accordance with the guidelines specified in the examination procedure. 7.1 Reseach students must present their thesis for examination within the maximum periods of study permitted for their degree: 7.2 Research students who are permitted entry with advanced standing must present their thesis for examination within the remaining time-limit permitted for the programme. Late Appeals section on our Appeal Regulations withdrawn due to increasingly bespoke requirements for remaining non-modular programmes. 15.3 No fee will be charged for the issue of a certificate and transcript. Our global community, reputation and . No. In the 1:2 weighting ratio, your second-year marks account for one third of your final grade, while your third-year marks contribute two thirds. Subject Examining Boards shall make recommendations, in writing, to the Composite Examining Board on: Composite Examining Board: A Composite Examining Board is responsible for one or more programmes and receives recommendations from more than one Subject Examining Board. Your Appeal webpages, Protected The amount of credit attributed to a module is based upon an estimation of the learning time taken by the average student to achieve the learning outcomes specified. 3.12A postgraduate student who has failed one or more modules on 2 occasions will be excluded from the programme. that is not outlined above, it may appropriate for you to engage with the University Complaints 5.3 The adviser(s) will support, advise and guide the candidate through the drafting of the critical review that accompanies the published works, in accordance with an agreed schedule of contacts, and the process of submission and examination. The provider designs and/or delivers high-quality courses. Submission of Late Course work - Removal of statement in relation to submission of Late Course work, which has been moved to the Student Study and Engagement Regulations. The School Education and Student Experience Committee will advise and report to the College Education and Student Experience Committee on matters including: 4.2.4. Formal evidence will be required to confirm that all requirements have been met. 8.4 Expectations of student conduct in examination venues, and details of permitted dictionaries and calculators in examination venues are specified in the Examination Procedure. The provider supports all students to achieve successful academic and professional outcomes. . Here you will find all the 5.1 The final mark used to classify degrees is the combined average of the module marks (calculated as specified in the module regulations) contributing to the final award, weighted according to the classification rule for the programme and credit value of the modules, calculated, rounded, and recorded as a whole number. Progress will be supported and monitored to maximise the likelihood of students completing their research degree within the expected timescale and in accordance with this Policy and Procedure. The examiners will be notified that a viva examination will not take place, and that corrections and revisions to the thesis will not be required. 3.1 Attendance is monitored by student contact with defined engagement points throughout the academic year. Extenuating Circumstances are defined as those that are: 2.1 We expect students to be engaged with their programme for its full duration and to satisfy the Universitys specified points of engagement. 5.4 The Policy and Procedure for the Monitoring of Research Students, and the Policy on Research Student Supervision will not apply. University results. Lovecraft and Hazel Heald. where assessment(s) or module(s) have been impacted by extenuating circumstances), the Examining Board will determine whether it is reasonable for the student to be assessed in all of these assessment/modules in the Resit Examination period. Generator to assist students with writing their appeals. Assessment and Examining Board Regulations. If students do not pass a required module they will not be able to progress to the next stage of the programme, nor graduate from the programme with the intended award. If your application for a review is rejected, and you feel that this is unreasonable given the detail, The resit mark will be capped at 50% if a student successfully passes the module on second attempt. Students who achieve a final mark of 58% or 59% will be awarded a degree classification of Second Class Honours, Division I (2:1) provided that: they have achieved a module mark of 60% or more in modules at Level 6 or Level 7 to the value of at least 120 credits. Removal of references to the Preliminary Year following its discontinuation. they have achieved a module mark of 70% or more in modules at level 5 or level 6 to the value of at least 120 credits. the Examining Board have met, and you are not happy, you will need to wait until much later in the year programme-level learning outcomes; aligned with the learning outcomes of core and required modules; reference to the QAA subject benchmark statement; reference to professional body accreditation; the structure of the programme, e.g. Extenuating Circumstances Procedure. 1.6 University officers may nominate alternates to act on their behalf. the DClinPsy and the DEdPsy may be studied full-time only prior to professional qualification, or part-time only after professional qualification; the student will be working on full-time research, and on a particular, agreed project; the research work will be undertaken under the direction and supervision of a main University supervisor nominated by the Head of School (in accordance with section 6 below); such control shall include the right of the supervisor to have reasonable access to the student and their work in their place of employment. Academic Appeal under the specific grounds outlined in the Academic The Chair of the Extenuating Circumstances Group or nominee. 8. Complaints and Appeals procedure for applicants: provides the policy and procedure for an applicant to submit a complaint or an appeal if they are dissatisfied with the conduct of the Universitys admissions process or its outcome.